"Cancer accounts for one in four deaths in Britain. Two people in five will develop some form of cancer during their lifetime". - Daily Mail 10/7/2000

On 28th July 1999 the Daily Mail reported that U.S. scientists gave 1,300 Chinese peasants vitamin and mineral supplements for four years, and recorded a 50% decrease in expected cancer deaths and a 37% fall in expected new cancer cases. Coincidence? No. In 1996 a study at the University of Arizona showed that in patients who have had skin cancer treatment, selenium additives of 200mcg a day halved the risk of dying from any type of cancer. In another test 39,000 Chinese took part in an experiment by taking supplements of the mineral selenium, and antioxidants beta carotene and ascorbil palmitate. Heart problems dropped by 41%, tumours by 20%, and cataracts by 4,396%!

Here's another thing, again from the Daily Mail (25/6/2001). The headline reads "Prostate cancer cases to double in 20 years". This was based on research by the Cancer Research Campaign. The article went on to say "Speaking in Brighton at the Third Global Conference for Cancer Organisations, Professor McVie said new treatments, (and) improvements in diet (my italics) will lead to a big fall in cancer deaths". The same article said that honey has been found to be rich in antioxidants which help protect the body. The following day there was an article on avoiding prostate cancer by healthy eating, and another on what antioxidants do. You need to read between the lines. When is the medical establishment going to put 2 and 2 together and realise that cancer is caused by a diet deficiency? When it was found that scurvy could be cured by eating fresh fruit nobody believed it for 400 years, and needless thousands of deaths resulted. In 1904 it was found that cancer could be prevented and cured by diet, but the doctor who said so was denounced as a quack. There are many non-industrial societies where cancer is unknown, and their diet is different.

Smoking does not cause cancer: I smoked 20 a day for 20 years and didn't get it. Luckily I lived for much of that time in a non-industrialised tropical country and ate a lot of fruit and veg. A tumour is not cancer: it is a symptom of cancer. Doctors treat cancer by attacking the tumour, instead of attacking the cause of the cancer. Cancer began increasing with the industrial revolution. We are being poisoned, and antioxidants fight the poison.

Drug companies get rich by fighting cancer: nobody will get rich by telling you to take more antioxidants, because you can't patent them. More people are making a living from cancer than are dying of it. If the war against cancer is won, a lot of people will be out of a job.

Cancer may be avoidable. Here's how:
Move to a clean environment, such as a tropical island;
eat a variety of fresh fruit, veg, and seeds;
eat oily fish;
avoid dairy and meat products. The enzymes used to digest them are needed as cancer protection.

If you can't do all the above, at least supplement your diet.

October 2000 'New Scientist' magazine reports that octyl methoxycinnamate (OMC), which can account for up to 7.5% of most (90%) sunblocks, can harm the skin. Tests on mouse cells found half died when weakly coated with OMC and exposed to light.
A European study also found that fair-skinned people were four times more likely to develop malignant melanomas after using psoralen-based suncreens than others. Could your sunscreen be giving you cancer?

Is there a cure for cancer? - click here
Check out my Mainly Men page here - hair loss, impotence, etc.